68 Ga-DOTA-Ibandronic Acid PET/CT in a Patient With Chemotherapy-Induced Salivary Gland Hypofunction.

ABSTRACT: DOTA-ibandronic acid (IBA) is a novel precursor targeting bone metastasis. It can be radiolabeled with 68 Ga for the diagnosis of bone metastases. However, extraosseous lesions can also show increased DOTA-IBA uptake. We report the 68 Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT findings in a case with cholangiocarcinoma with multiple bone metastases. 68 Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT revealed increased uptake of DOTA-IBA in bone metastases. Besides, symmetrical and diffuse increased DOTA-IBA uptake in bilateral salivary glands was observed. 99m TcO 4- salivary gland scintigraphy showed impaired salivary gland function.

Investigate the Therapeutic Effect of Ibandronate Sodium on Knee Osteoarthritis Based on TLRs/MyD88/NF-κB Signaling Pathway in Vitro and in Vivo.

BACKGROUND: For decades, bisphosphonates have primarily found application in clinical practice for the treatment and prevention of bone metastases associated with malignant tumors and various bone metabolic disorders. However, third-generation bisphosphonates like ibandronate have demonstrated significant utility in addressing conditions like osteoporosis (OA) and other bone metabolism-related ailments. Ibandronate, distinguished by its high effectiveness, low toxicity, and ease of administration, has garnered attention for its potential applications in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, OA, and orthopedic concerns. In recent years, the utilization of ibandronate sodium in these contexts has sparked considerable interest. Research has pointed to a possible connection between ibandronate and the Toll-like receptors (TLRs), myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway, particularly in the context of inflammation and immunological regulation. Consequently, this study is designed to investigate the therapeutic impact of ibandronate on in vitro and in vivo models of knee osteoarthritis, while also delving into its influence on the TLRs/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. METHOD: Various dosages of ibandronate sodium, including low (10 g/kg), medium (20 g/kg), and high (30 g/kg), were administered following the establishment of both in vivo and in vitro models of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Post-intervention, an in-depth quantitative analysis of bone tissue microstructure was conducted. The morphology of articular cartilage tissue was observed in vivo, and the modified Mankin score was subsequently calculated. In the in vitro setting, cartilage was entirely isolated, and mRNA and total protein were extracted to measure the expression levels of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB at both the mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, the study explored the effects of Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) on cell proliferation, apoptosis, stromal decomposition enzyme activity, ossification, and the expression of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB. RESULT: In the results of the in vivo experiments, several noteworthy findings emerged. The knee curvature, gait score, Mankin score, pathological knee joint injury degree, cartilage protein loss, and trabecular separation within the model group exhibited significant elevations compared to both the sham operation group and the blank control group (p < 0.05). Conversely, bone density, bone volume fraction, and trabecular thickness in the model group displayed lower values in comparison to the sham operation and blank control groups (p < 0.05). Following the administration of ibandronate sodium, there was a progressive improvement in these parameters, with the medium and high-dose groups demonstrating the most favorable outcomes (p < 0.05). Additionally, the model group exhibited the highest expression levels of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB, while the ibandronate sodium intervention group displayed reduced expression levels of these markers, with the high-dose group registering the most significant changes (p < 0.05). Turning to the in vitro experiments, it was observed that the cell proliferation capacity and ossification degree of the IL-1ß-induced group experienced declines, concomitant with an increase in stromal decomposition enzyme activity and cell apoptosis rate (p < 0.05). However, post-intervention with ibandronate sodium, all these indicators gradually returned to normal, with the medium-dose group exhibiting the most notable improvements. The expression levels of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB in the IL-1ß-induced group showed an increase, while the expression levels in the ibandronate sodium intervention group displayed a decrease, particularly in the high-dose group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ibandronate sodium demonstrates a protective effect on articular chondrocytes and exhibits the potential to decelerate the pathological progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in rats. This mechanism is likely achieved through the inhibition of the TLRs/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway.

Zoledronic acid and ibandronate-induced nephrotoxicity in 2D and 3D proximal tubule cells derived from human and rat.

Drug-induced proximal tubule (PT) injury remains a serious safety concern throughout drug development. Traditional in vitro 2-dimensional (2D) and preclinical in vivo models often fail to predict drug-related injuries presented in clinical trials. Various 3-dimensional (3D) microphysiological systems (MPSs) have been developed to mimic physiologically relevant properties, enabling them to be more predictive toward nephrotoxicity. To explore the capabilities of an MPS across species, we compared cytotoxicity in hRPTEC/TERT1s and rat primary proximal tubular epithelial cells (rPPTECs) following exposure to zoledronic acid and ibandronate (62.5-500 µM), and antibiotic polymyxin B (PMB) (50 and 250 µM, respectively). For comparison, we investigated cytotoxicity using 2D cultured hRPTEC/TERT1s and rPPTECs following exposure to the same drugs, including overlapping concentrations, as their 3D counterparts. Regardless of the in vitro model, bisphosphonate-exposed rPPTECs exhibited cytotoxicity quicker than hRPTEC/TERT1s. PMB was less sensitive toward nephrotoxicity in rPPTECs than hRPTEC/TERT1s, demonstrating differences in species sensitivity within both 3D and 2D models. Generally, 2D cultured cells experienced faster drug-induced cytotoxicity compared to the MPSs, suggesting that MPSs can be advantageous for longer-term drug-exposure studies, if warranted. Furthermore, ibandronate-exposed hRPTEC/TERT1s and rPPTECs produced higher levels of inflammatory and kidney injury biomarkers compared to zoledronic acid, indicating that ibandronate induces acute kidney injury, but also a potential protective response since ibandronate is less toxic than zoledronic acid. Our study suggests that the MPS model can be used for preclinical screening of compounds prior to animal studies and human clinical trials.

The effectiveness of ibandronate in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Ibandronate is effective in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures, but experimental evidence offers conflicting results regarding nonvertebral fractures. Real-world evidence has been published evaluating the anti-nonvertebral fracture effect of ibandronate. AIM: This meta-analysis of observational studies assessed the effectiveness of ibandronate in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis. METHOD: Pubmed/Embase databases were searched for observational studies. Risks of nonvertebral fractures and hip fractures were the outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed pooling rate ratios (RRs), using random-effects models. Data were reanalysed in sensitivity analyses considering Knapp-Hartung method and Bayesian random-effects. RESULTS: Six cohort studies were included. Overall, once-monthly 150 mg oral ibandronate reduced the risk of nonvertebral fractures (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.94). Similar results were obtained when the comparison was restricted to once-monthly 150 mg risedronate, but no differences were found when the comparator was other oral bisphosphonates (weekly alendronate/risedronate). Ibandronate didn't significantly change the risk of hip fractures (RR 1.25; 95% CI 0.89-1.76). The risk of hip fracture was comparable between once monthly, 150 mg oral ibandronate and other oral bisphosphonates. Intravenous ibandronate was not effective in reducing hip fractures comparing to intravenous zoledronate. The low number of studies diminished the robustness of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that once-monthly 150 mg oral ibandronate may be as effective as other oral bisphosphonates in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures. However, uncertainty associated to the small number of included studies, which are characterized by heterogeneous demographics and methodologies, precluded definitive conclusions.

Adjuvant capecitabine versus nihil in older patients with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer receiving ibandronate - The ICE randomized clinical trial.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Evaluation of the impact of a de-escaleted chemotherapy regimen consisting of capecitabine (Cap) on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients ≥65 years with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer (BC) receiving ibandronate (Ib). METHODS: ICE (Ib with or without Cap in Elderly patients with early breast cancer) was a multicentre phase 3 clinical trial with a 2020 update of long-term follow-up for overall survival enroling node-positive/high-risk node-negative patients ≥65 years with early BC. Patients were randomised to Cap 2000 mg/m² day 1-14 q3w for 6 cycles plus Ib (50 mg p.o. daily or alternatively 6 mg intravenous q4w) or Ib alone for 2 years. Endocrine therapy was recommended for hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients. The primary endpoint was iDFS analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank analysis. RESULTS: 1358 (96.4%) of 1409 randomised patients started treatment. 564 (83.4%) completed 6 cycles of Cap. 513 (77.7%) and 516 (78.8%) completed Ib in the Cap+Ib and Ib alone arm, respectively. Median age was 71 (range 64-88) years, 1099 (81%) were HR-positive, 705 (51.9%) node-negative. At a median follow-up of 61.3 months, 5-year iDFS was 78.8% for Cap+Ib versus 75.0% for Ib alone (p = 0.80). Effects were independent of age, nodal, and HR status. The addition of Cap caused significantly higher skin and gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The adjuvant combination of Cap+Ib did not show significantly better iDFS than Ib alone in node-positive/high-risk node-negative older BC patients, of whom HR-positive patients were also treated with endocrine therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study in elderly patients with early breast cancer (ICE), NCT00196859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00196859?term=NCT00196859.

Denosumab Improves Glycaemic Parameters in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Patients with Combined Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

This study aimed to determine whether RANKL inhibitors in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with combined type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) could improve their glucose metabolism index. First of all, 84 patients affected with postmenopausal osteoporosis with combined T2DM attending the Department of Endocrinology at the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University were selected and randomized into two groups of 42 patients each. One group was given Denosumab 60 mg once every six months (denosumab group, D.G.), and the other group was given 2 mg ibandronate once every three months (ibandronate group, I.G.). Blood glucose parameters were compared before and after treatment in both groups and serum active GLP-1 levels and DPP-4 levels were also assessed. After treatment, there was no significant difference in fasting glucose between the two groups, but there was a significant decrease in fasting glucose in the Denosumab Group (D.G.) compared to before treatment. There was a significant difference in 2-hour postprandial glucose (2hPG) between the two groups after treatment, with the D.G. being lower than the ibandronate group (I.G.). Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was lower in the D.G. than in the I.G. after treatment, but the difference between them was insignificant. In the D.G., serum active GLP-1 levels increased after treatment, and serum DPP-4 levels decreased. Serum GLP-1 and DPP-4 levels in the I.G. did not change compared with those before treatment. In conclusion, In the clinical management of postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with combined T2DM, the choice of RANKL inhibitors as anti-osteoporosis therapy may benefit their glycaemic parameters by elevating serum active GLP-1 levels and decreasing serum DPP-4 levels.

Clinicians' views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate medications, including alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate administered orally and zoledronate, administered intravenously, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of osteoporosis based on evidence that, correctly taken, bisphosphonates can improve bone strength and lead to a reduction in the risk of fragility fractures. However, it is currently unclear how decisions to select between bisphosphonate regimens, including intravenous regimen, are made in practice and how clinicians support patients with different treatments. METHODS: This was an interpretivist qualitative study. 23 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of general practitioners (GPs), secondary care clinicians, specialist experts as well as those providing and leading novel treatments including participants from a community intravenous (IV) zoledronate service. Data analysis was undertaken through a process of iterative categorisation. RESULTS: The results report clinicians varying experiences of making treatment choices, as well as wider aspects of osteoporosis care. Secondary care and specialist clinicians conveyed some confidence in making treatment choices including on selecting IV treatment. This was aided by access to diagnostic testing and medication expertise. In contrast GPs reported a number of challenges in prescribing bisphosphonate medications for osteoporosis and uncertainty about treatment choice. Results also highlight how administering IV zoledronate was seen as an opportunity to engage in broader care practices. CONCLUSION: Approaches to making treatment decisions and supporting patients when prescribing bisphosphonates for osteoporosis vary in practice. This study points to the need to co-ordinate osteoporosis treatment and care across different care providers.

Comparison of the prophylactic use of ibandronate and its use in early-stage osteonecrosis in rats with steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ibandronate before and after the onset of osteonecrosis in rats with steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 female Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Three groups were formed with eight rats in each group. The first group was the prophylactic group that received ibandronate treatment before and after the onset of osteonecrosis (Group PT). The second group received ibandronate treatment three weeks after the development of osteonecrosis (Group TAO). The third group was the control group in which osteonecrosis was created, but only normal saline (NS) was given. At the end of the study, all rats were sacrificed, and their right femoral heads were removed, fixed with formalin, and sent for micro-computed tomography. Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical examinations of the right femoral head sections were performed. RESULTS: In the PT group, the trabecular thickness was significantly higher compared to those of the TAO and control groups (p<0.05). The trabecular thickness did not significantly differ between the TAO and control groups. The trabecular bone pattern factor was significantly higher in the PT group compared to the control and TAO groups (p<0.05); however, it showed no significant difference between the TAO and control groups. The incidence of type 2 osteonecrosis in the PT and TAO groups was significantly lower than that in the control group (p<0.05). The incidence of tissue-non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNAPase) immunoreactivity of osteoblast positivity was significantly higher in the PT and TAO groups compared to the control group (p<0.05), whereas the incidence of TRAPase immunoreactivity of osteoclastic positivity was significantly lower in the PT and TAO groups compared to the control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intravenous administration of ibandronate before the onset of the disease was more effective in the treatment of osteonecrosis in rats with steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Drug efficacy and safety of denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid, and ibandronic acid for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid, and ibandronic acid for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane up to April 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.1.3 software, and quality evaluation was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: 51 RCTs containing 39,095 patients met our selection criteria. The efficacy results indicated that teriparatide was more effective than ibandronic acid in reducing vertebral fractures [relative risk (RR) = 0.536; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.266, 0.998)]. Denosumab [mean difference (MD) = -4.19; 95% CI (-8.03, -0.355)] and teriparatide [MD = 4.64; 95% CI (1.60, 7.72)] showed better efficacy than ibandronic acid in improving spine bone mineral density (BMD). Denosumab showed better efficacy than teriparatide in improving radius BMD [MD = -4.14; 95% CI (-6.72, -1.54)], hip bone mineral density (BMD) [MD = -2.01; 95% CI (-3.80, -0.162)], and one-third radius BMD [MD = -3.63; 95% CI (-7.04, -0.151)]. Denosumab was associated with the greatest benefit in increasing radius BMD [the surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) = 0.999], hip BMD [surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) = 0.979], femoral neck BMD (SUCRA = 0.971), one-third radius BMD (SUCRA = 0.994) and preventing vertebral fractures (SUCRA = 0.806). Teriparatide was associated with the greatest benefit in preventing non-vertebral fractures (SUCRA = 0.927) and improving spine BMD (SUCRA = 0.899). The safety results indicated that teriparatide was safer than zoledronic acid regarding the risk of adverse events [RR = 0.958; 95% CI (0.919, 0.988)]. Teriparatide was associated with the greatest benefit in preventing adverse events (SUCRA = 0.908) and serious adverse events (SUCRA = 0.813). CONCLUSIONS: Our current results suggested that when considering both safety and efficacy, denosumab or teriparatide might be a better choice for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Osteoprotegerin genetic polymorphisms and their influence on therapeutic response to ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporotic females.

OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated osteoprotegerin (OPG) genetic polymorphisms and their influence on the therapeutic response to ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporotic females. METHODS: This case-control study included 135 postmenopausal females (89 osteoporotic females and 46 non-osteoporotic females). Each osteoporotic patient received a monthly 150 mg ibandronate tablet for six months, and blood samples were taken before and after treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using DEXA Scan. Three SNPs (A163G, T245G, and G1181C) of the OPG gene were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Serum OPG levels were significantly lower in osteoporotic subjects than in the control group. The percentage changes in OPG levels in the osteoporotic group before and after treatment with ibandronate were significant (p < .001). After six months of therapy with ibandronate, the percentage changes in OPG levels with AA, TT, TC, GC, and GG genotypes were significant. Following six months of ibandronate treatment, the AA genotype of rs3134069, TT, TC genotypes of rs3102735, GG, and GC genotypes of rs2073618 SNP showed a significant increase in OPG levels. Age, BMI, and GC polymorphism (rs2073618 (G/C) G1181C) were inversely associated with low BMD. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) showed that BMI, GC, GG polymorphism (rs2073618 (G/C) G1181C) and TC polymorphism (rs3102735 (T/C) A163G) were inversely associated with low BMD. CONCLUSION: The inverse association of rs2073618 and rs3102735 with low BMD indicates the protective role of these SNPs in our population. More research is needed to replicate these results in another cohort and to determine the molecular processes by which such SNPs may influence BMD.

Comparison of anti-fracture effectiveness of zoledronate, ibandronate and alendronate versus denosumab in a registry-based cohort study.

This registry-based study of 3068 patients with osteoporosis compared the anti-fracture effectiveness of denosumab versus bisphosphonates. Denosumab was associated with significantly greater risk reduction than alendronate or ibandronate for vertebral and any fractures. No difference in fracture risk reduction was found between zoledronate and denosumab. PURPOSE: To analyse the fracture risk of patients with osteoporosis receiving bisphosphonates or denosumab in a real-world setting. METHODS: This registry-based cohort study evaluated patients taking denosumab, bisphosphonates or both sequentially. Fractures were analysed using rates, rate ratios and hazard ratios (HR), including both therapies as time-varying co-variates. Fracture risk hazards were adjusted (aHR) for baseline T-Scores and trabecular bone score (TBS) and were additionally analysed with inverse probability treatment weighting. RESULTS: A total of 3068 patients (89% female; median age at treatment onset, 69 years [63 to 76]) received denosumab (median duration 2.8 years, [2.2 to 4.7]), bisphosphonates (3.4 years, [2.1 to 5.7]) or both sequentially. Thus, 11,078 subject-years were assessed for bisphosphonates (41% alendronate, 36% ibandronate, 23% zoledronate) and 4216 for denosumab. Moreover, 48,375 subject-years were observed before treatment onset, in addition to 2593 years of drug holidays. A total of 1481 vertebral fractures (435 under therapy), 1508 non-vertebral fractures (499 under therapy) and 202 hip fractures (67 under therapy) occurred after age 50. The risks of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures were significantly lower under all bisphosphonates, denosumab and drug holidays than before treatment onset (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, baseline T-scores and TBS, denosumab was associated with lower risk than alendronate or ibandronate for vertebral fractures (aHR 0.47 (0.35 to 0.64) and 0.70 [0.53 to 0.91], p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively) and any fractures (aHR 0.62 [0.51 to 0.76] and 0.77 [0.64 to 0.92], p < 0.001 and p = 0.004). With propensity weighting, denosumab was associated with a lower hip fracture risk compared to alendronate (HR 0.54 [0.29 to 0.98], p = 0.044). No difference in fracture risk reduction (vertebral, non-vertebral or hip) was found between zoledronate and denosumab. CONCLUSIONS: When adjusting for disease severity, denosumab was associated with significantly greater risk reduction than alendronate and ibandronate for vertebral fractures. No difference in fracture risk reduction was found between zoledronate and denosumab.

Biodistribution and Internal Dosimetry of 68 Ga-DOTA-IBA PET Imaging for Patients With Bone Metastases.

PURPOSE: We have developed a new pharmaceutical, ibandronic acid (IBA), and preliminarily demonstrated that it is an efficient bisphosphonate for the diagnosis and treatment of bone metastases. This study aims to examine the biodistribution and internal dosimetry of the diagnostic 68 Ga-DOTA-IBA in patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 68 Ga-DOTA-IBA was intravenously injected based on 1.81-2.57 MBq/Kg into 8 patients with bone metastases. Each patient underwent 4 sequential static whole-body PET scans at 0.1, 0.45, 0.8, and 1.8 hours after injection. The acquisition time for each scan was 20 minutes with 10 bed positions. Image registrations and volume of interest delineation were first performed on Hermes, whereas percentage injected activity (%IA), absorbed dose, and effective dose were measured for source organs, using OLINDA/EXM v2.0. Dosimetrics for the bladder was based on a bladder voiding model. RESULTS: No adverse effects were observed on all patients. After the injection, 68 Ga-DOTA-IBA rapidly accumulated in bone metastases and cleared from nonbone tissues, as indicated by visual analysis and %IA measured on the sequential scans. High activity uptake was presented in the expected target organs, that is, bone, red marrow, and the drug-excretion organs such as kidneys and bladder. The mean total body effective dose is 0.022 ± 0.002 mSv/MBq. CONCLUSIONS: 68 Ga-DOTA-IBA has high bone affinity and is promising in the diagnosis of bone metastases. Dosimetric results show that the absorbed doses for critical organs and total body are within the safety limit and with high bone retention. It also has the potential to be used in 177 Lu-therapy as a theranostic pair.

Evaluation of osseointegration of Ti-6Al-4V alloy orthodontic mini-screws with ibandronate-loaded TiO2 nanotube layer.

Recently, the use of orthodontic mini-screws as an anchorage for orthodontic treatment is increasing, and the degree of osseointegration of the mini-screws affects the performance of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility and osseointegration of Titanium 6Aluminum 4Vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy orthodontic mini-screws with an ibandronate-loaded TiO2 nanotube (TNT) layer. The TNT layer was formed on the surface of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy orthodontic mini-screws and loaded with ibandronate. The TNT formed by anodic oxidation formed a completely self-organized and compact structure and was stably released for 7 days after loading with ibandronate. Mini-screws loaded with ibandronate were implanted into both tibias of rats, confirming rapid initial bone regeneration. We demonstrate that the release of stable ibandronate from the TNT layer of Ti-6Al-4V alloy orthodontic mini-screws can effectively improve biocompatibility and osseointegration.

Atypical femur fracture associated with common anti-osteoporosis drugs in FDA adverse event reporting system.

Atypical femur fracture (AFF) is a rare but catastrophic adverse event first reported in the long-term use of alendronate, one of the most commonly used drugs for osteoporosis currently. However, further evidence is needed to learn more regarding other common anti-osteoporosis drugs and the risk for AFF. In this study, reports of AFF were identified from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. Disproportionality analyses were performed to examine the reporting odds ratio (ROR), information component (IC) and adjusted ROR (adj. ROR) signals for AFF for common anti-osteoporosis drugs. A total of 1692 unique AFF reports were identified. The disproportionality signals (the lower bound of 95% confidence interval > 1 for ROR and adjusted ROR, and > 0 for IC) were detected for alendronate, denosumab, pamidronate, risedronate, zoledronate, ibandronate, and teriparatide while no signal was detected for raloxifene, abaloparatide, and romosozumab. When restricted in patients with osteoporosis, the disproportionality signals were still detected for alendronate, pamidronate, risedronate, denosumab, and ibandronate. Our results suggest that alendronate has the largest risk signal, while the risks varied among different bisphosphonates. In addition, denosumab was found statistically associated with AFF in both the entire database and patients with osteoporosis.

177Lu-DOTA-IBA Therapy in Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastases.

ABSTRACT: Bone is the most common metastatic site in patients with prostate cancer. 177Lu-DOTA-ibandronic acid (177Lu-DOTA-IBA) is a new therapeutic radiopharmaceutical targeting bone metastasis. We report a case of refractory bone pain due to bone metastasis, who demonstrated an excellent therapy response after 3 cycles of 177Lu-DOTA-IBA therapy. In addition, the patient did not have any observable adverse reactions. 177Lu-DOTA-IBA may be a promising radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of bone metastasis.

Constraining in reimbursement criteria and the adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) in Taiwan: Urbanization makes the difference.

BACKGROUND: The Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan implemented a new reimbursement scheme incorporating bone mineral density (BMD) criteria on Jan. 1, 2011. This study aimed to investigate a real-life 11-year secular trend of adherence in new AOMs users and evaluated the change of adherence to AOMs therapy in different urbanization areas after reimbursement criteria were restrained. METHODS: We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to identify new AOMs users as our study population. The AOMs in this study included denosumab, zoledronate, ibandronate, alendronate, raloxifene, and risedronate. The first prescription date of AOMs was defined as the cohort entry date. The adherence rates within one year after initiation were assessed. RESULTS: High adherence (≥75%) in the first year increased markedly after the new reimbursement scheme in 2011, changing from 31.8% in 2008, and 41.7% in 2011 to 54.2% in 2018. On the other hand, low adherence (<25%) decreased from 38.8% in 2008 to 14.6% in 2018. In addition, the switchers increased from 5.9% in 2008 to 9.3% in 2018, indicating a more flexible choice of AOMs. The proportion of high adherence to AOMs was highest in high-urbanization areas, and the proportion increased about two times from 30% in 2008 to 60% in 2018. CONCLUSION: The implementation of new reimbursement criteria in 2011 was associated with increased adherence to AOMs and the increase was most apparent in high-urbanization areas.

The Clinical Effectiveness of Denosumab (Prolia®) for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women, Compared to Bisphosphonates, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERM), and Placebo: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

To assess the effectiveness and safety of denosumab (Prolia®) compared to bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, zoledronate), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs; bazedoxifene, raloxifene) or placebo, for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women (PMW). Systematic searches were run in PubMed, Embase & Cochrane Library on 27-April-2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included osteoporotic PMW allocated to denosumab, SERMs, bisphosphonates, or placebo were eligible for inclusion. RCTs were appraised using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0. Bayesian network and/or pairwise meta-analyses were conducted on predetermined outcomes (i.e. vertebral/nonvertebral fractures, bone mineral density [BMD], mortality, adverse events [AEs], serious AEs (SAEs), withdrawals due to AEs, AEs caused by denosumab discontinuation). A total of 12 RCTs (k = 22 publications; n = 25,879 participants) were included in the analyses. Denosumab, reported a statistically significant increase in lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) BMD, compared to placebo. Similarly, denosumab also resulted in a statistically significant increase in TH BMD compared to the raloxifene and bazedoxifene. However, relative to denosumab, alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate resulted in significant improvements in both femoral neck (FN) and LS BMD. With regards to vertebral fractures and all safety outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences between denosumab and any of the comparator. Relative to placebo, denosumab was associated with significant benefits in both LS and TH BMD. Additionally, denosumab (compared to placebo) was not associated with reductions in vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Finally, denosumab was not associated with improvement in safety outcomes, compared to placebo. These findings should be interpreted with caution as some analyses suffered from statistical imprecision.

Undercarboxylated osteocalcin and ibandronate combination ameliorates hindlimb immobilization-induced muscle wasting.

Immobilization leads to muscle wasting and insulin resistance, particularly during ageing. It has been suggested that undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) improves muscle mass and glucose metabolism. Bisphosphonates, an anti-osteoporosis treatment, might protect muscle wasting independent of ucOC. We hypothesize that the combination of ucOC and ibandronate (IBN) treatments has superior protective effects against immobilization-induced muscle wasting and insulin resistance than either treatment alone. C57BL/6J mice were hindlimb-immobilized for two weeks, with injections of vehicle, ucOC (90 ng/g daily) and/or IBN (2 µg/g weekly). Insulin/oral glucose tolerance tests (ITT/OGTT) were performed. Immediately after immobilization, muscles (extensor digitorum longus (EDL), soleus, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius and quadriceps) were isolated and measured for muscle mass. Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (EDL and soleus) was examined. Phosphorylation/expression of proteins in anabolic/catabolic pathways were examined in quadriceps. Primary human myotubes derived from older adult muscle biopsies were treated with ucOC and/or IBN, then signalling proteins were analysed. Combined treatment, but not individual treatments, significantly increased the muscle weight/body weight ratio in immobilized soleus (31.7%; P = 0.013) and quadriceps (20.0%; P = 0.0008) muscles, concomitant with elevated p-Akt (S473)/Akt ratio (P = 0.0047). Combined treatment also enhanced whole-body glucose tolerance (16.6%; P = 0.0011). In human myotubes, combined treatment stimulated greater activation of ERK1/2 (P = 0.0067 and 0.0072) and mTOR (P = 0.036), and led to a lesser expression of Fbx32 (P = 0.049) and MuRF1 (P = 0.048) than individual treatments. These findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for the ucOC and bisphosphonates combination in protecting against muscle wasting induced by immobilization and ageing. KEY POINTS: It has been suggested that undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) improves muscle mass and glucose metabolism. Bisphosphonates, an anti-osteoporosis treatment, might protect against muscle wasting independent of ucOC. The combination treatment of ucOC and ibandronate was shown to exert a greater therapeutic effect against immobilization-induced muscle wasting, and led to greater activation of anabolic pathway and less expression of catabolic signalling proteins in myotubes derived from older adults, compared with individual treatments. The combination treatment was found to improve whole-body glucose tolerance. Our findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for the ucOC and bisphosphonates combination in protecting against muscle wasting induced by immobilization and ageing.

Ibandronate in the Prevention of Vertebral and Nonvertebral Osteoporotic Fractures: A Systematic Review of Experimental and Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate ibandronate clinical effectiveness in the prevention of osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures (VFs) and nonvertebral fractures (NVFs) in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination's guidance and reporting in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement 2020. A literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE since their inception until February 7, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analysis, experimental, and observational studies evaluating adult patients treated with ibandronate and assessed to osteoporotic fractures prevention were included. The risk of bias was assessed according to study design. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Eight references from 4 RCTs, 7 meta-analyses, and 6 observational studies were included. In RCTs, oral ibandronate was superior to placebo in the prevention of VF. However, the doses were lower than those approved. The meta-analyses confirmed these results and showed that adequate doses of oral ibandronate reduce the risk of NVF compared with insufficient doses. In observational studies, oral ibandronate (in approved doses) reduced the risk of VF compared with no treatment or risedronate or alendronate and the risk of NVF versus risedronate or alendronate; the risk of hip fractures was similar between ibandronate and other oral bisphosphonates. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence that ibandronate reduces the risk of VF in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The available evidence further suggests that ibandronate may reduce the risk of NVF versus insufficient doses of ibandronate, as well as risedronate or alendronate.

Lutetium177-Labeled DOTA-Ibandronate: A Novel Radiopharmaceutical for Targeted Treatment of Bone Metastases.

Bone metastases of malignant tumors significantly threaten the patient survival and quality of life. We designed and synthesized a novel bisphosphonate radiopharmaceutical [68Ga- or 177Lu-labeled DOTA-Ibandronate(68Ga/177Lu-DOTA-IBA)] for targeted diagnosis and treatment of bone metastases. This study explored the basic biological characteristics of 177Lu-DOTA-IBA, guiding clinical translation and providing evidence for future clinical applications. The control variable method was used to optimize the optimal labeling conditions. The in vitro properties, biological distribution, and toxicity of 177Lu-DOTA-IBA were studied. Normal mice and tumor-bearing mice were imaged using micro SPECT/CT. With Ethics Committee approval, five volunteers were recruited for a preliminary clinical translation study. 177Lu-DOTA-IBA has a radiochemical purity of more than 98%, with good biological properties and safety. Blood clearance is fast and soft tissue uptake is low. Tracers are excreted mainly through the urinary system, targeting and continuously concentrating in the bones. Three patients experienced significant pain relief within 3 days after 177Lu-DOTA-IBA treatment (740-1110 MBq), lasting more than 2 months, with no toxic side effects. 177Lu-DOTA-IBA is easy to prepare and exhibits good pharmacokinetic characteristics. Low-dose 177Lu-DOTA-IBA is effective, well tolerated, and was associated with no significant adverse reactions. It is a promising radiopharmaceutical for the targeted treatment of bone metastases, controlling the progress of bone metastasis and improving survival and quality of life of patients with advanced bone metastasis.